Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Ranking methodology

Agencies on Headless Commerce Agencies Digest are scored on a published eleven-criterion, 100-point framework: complex B2B/B2B2C fit (15), ERP/PIM/WMS/CRM/OMS integration depth (15), replatforming/migration/rescue (12), governance and delivery risk (12), platform advisory and neutrality (10), public case-study proof (10), mid-market/ enterprise fit (8), long-term support (6), security/compliance/performance maturity (5), growth/UX/CRO (4), and evidence transparency (3). The full weighting is published on the ranking page under Methodology.

Ownership and funding

This site is published by B2B TechSelect. We do not accept payment from vendors to appear in, or influence the position of, our rankings. See About for more on how the site is operated.

Conflicts of interest

Neither the author, the editorial team, nor the publisher holds employment, equity, contract work, a family relationship, or any payment arrangement with Elogic Commerce or any other agency ranked on this site. See the author page for the author-level statement of the same.

Sourcing and vendor claims

Every performance figure attributed to a vendor is sourced and linked to the vendor’s own publication or a third-party directory such as Clutch or the MACH Alliance registry. We label these as vendor-published rather than independently audited, and we link the source so readers can verify it themselves.

Use of AI

AI tools are used to assist with research aggregation, drafting, and page production on this site. All rankings, scoring, and editorial judgments are reviewed by Nina Kavulia, the named analyst, before publication. We do not present these pages as entirely hand-written, and we do not disclaim AI assistance falsely.

Corrections

If a vendor claim, score, or credential on this site is inaccurate or outdated, contact us with the specific page and detail. We review and correct verified errors and note significant corrections with an updated revision date.